Doane 2011 J Statistics Education: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary ย |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Cited by == | == Cited by == | ||
{{Template:Cited by Gnaiger 2021 MitoFit | {{Template:Cited by Gnaiger 2021 MitoFit BCA}} | ||
{{Labeling | {{Labeling | ||
|area=Instruments;methods | |area=Instruments;methods | ||
|additional=MitoFit 2021 BCA | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:31, 24 August 2021
Doane DP, Seward LE (2011) Measuring skewness: a forgotten statistic? J Statistics Education 19,2:1-18. |
ยป Open Access
Doane David P, Seward Lori E (2011) J Statistics Education
Abstract: This paper discusses common approaches to presenting the topic of skewness in the classroom, and explains why students need to know how to measure it. Two skewness statistics are examined: the Fisher-Pearson standardized third moment coefficient, and the Pearson 2 coefficient that compares the mean and median. The former is reported in statistical software packages, while the latter is all but forgotten in textbooks. Given its intuitive appeal, why did Pearson 2 disappear? Is it ever useful? Using Monte Carlo simulation, tables of percentiles are created for Pearson 2. It is shown that while Pearson 2 has lower power, it matches classroom explanations of skewness and can be calculated when summarized data are available. This paper suggests reviving the Pearson 2 skewness statistic for the introductory statistics course because it compares the mean to the median in a precise way that students can understand. The paper reiterates warnings about what any skewness statistic can actually tell us.
โข Bioblast editor: Gnaiger E
Compare
Cited by
- Gnaiger E (2021) Bioenergetic cluster analysis โ mitochondrial respiratory control in human fibroblasts. MitoFit Preprints 2021.8. https://doi.org/10.26124/mitofit:2021-0008
Labels: MiParea: Instruments;methods
MitoFit 2021 BCA