Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

Difference between revisions of "Gnaiger 2018 EBEC2018"

From Bioblast
(Created page with "{{Abstract |title=The protonmotive force under pressure: an isomorphic analysis. |info=EBEC2018 |authors=Gnaiger E |year=2018 |event=EBEC2018 Budapest HU |abstract=‘.. '...")
 
Line 5: Line 5:
|year=2018
|year=2018
|event=EBEC2018 Budapest HU
|event=EBEC2018 Budapest HU
|abstract=‘.. ''the sum of the '''electrical pressure difference''' and the '''osmotic pressure difference''' (i.e. the electrochemical potential difference) of protons''’ [1] links to non-ohmic flux-force relationships between proton leak and protonmotive force (pmf). This is experimentally established, has direct consequences on mitochondrial physiology, but is theoretically little understood. Here I distinguish pressure from potential differences (diffusion: Δ''μ<sub>H</sub>+'' or Δ<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>H</sub>+; electric: Δ''Ψ'' or Δ<sub>el</sub>''F''), to explain non-ohmic flux-force relationships on the basis of four thermodynamic theorems. (1) Einstein’s diffusion equation explains the concentration gradient (d''c''/d''z'') in Fick’s law as the product of chemical potential gradient (the vector force and resistance determine the velocity, v, of a particle) and local concentration, ''c''. This yields the chemical pressure gradient (van’t Hoff equation): d<sub>d</sub>Π/d''z'' = RT∙d''c''/d''z''. Flux is the product of ''v'' and ''c''; ''c'' varies with force. Therefore, flux-force relationships are non-linear. (2) The pmf is not a vector force; the gradient is replaced by a pressure difference, and local concentration by a distribution function or free activity, ''α''. Flux is a function of ''α'' and force, ''J''<sub>d</sub> = ''b''∙''α''∙Δ<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>B</sub> = -''b''∙Δ<sub>d</sub>Π<sub>B</sub>. (3) At Δ<sub>el</sub>''F'' = -Δ<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>H</sub>+, the diffusion pressure of protons, Δ<sub>d</sub>Π<sub>H</sub>+ = ''RT''∙Δ<sub>c</sub><sub>H</sub>+ [Pa=J∙m<sup>-3</sup>] is balanced by electric pressure, maintained by counterions of H<sup>+</sup>. Diffusional and electric pressures are isomorphic, additive, and yield protonmotive pressure (pmp). (4) The dependence of proton leak on pmf varies with Δ<sub>el</sub>''F'' versus Δ<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>H</sub>+, in agreement with experimental evidence. The flux-force relationship is concave at high mitochondrial volume fractions, but near-exponential at small mt-matrix volume ratios. Linear flux-pmp relationships imply a near-exponential dependence of the proton leak on the pmf.
|abstract=‘.. ''the sum of the '''electrical pressure difference''' and the '''osmotic pressure difference''' (i.e. the electrochemical potential difference) of protons''’ [1] links to non-ohmic flux-force relationships between proton leak and protonmotive force (pmf). This is experimentally established, has direct consequences on mitochondrial physiology, but is theoretically little understood. Here I distinguish pressure from potential differences (diffusion: Δ''μ<sub>H</sub>+'' or Δ<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>H</sub>+; electric: Δ''Ψ'' or Δ<sub>el</sub>''F''), to explain non-ohmic flux-force relationships on the basis of four thermodynamic theorems. (1) Einstein’s diffusion equation explains the concentration gradient (d''c''/d''z'') in Fick’s law as the product of chemical potential gradient (the vector force and resistance determine the velocity, ''v'', of a particle) and local concentration, ''c''. This yields the chemical pressure gradient (van’t Hoff equation): d<sub>d</sub>Π/dz = RT∙d''c''/d''z''. Flux is the product of ''v'' and ''c''; ''c'' varies with force. Therefore, flux-force relationships are non-linear. (2) The pmf is not a vector force; the gradient is replaced by a pressure difference, and local concentration by a distribution function or free activity, ''α''. Flux is a function of ''α'' and force, ''J''<sub>d</sub> = ''b''∙''α''∙Δ<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>B</sub> = -''b''∙Δ<sub>d</sub>Π<sub>B</sub>. (3) At Δ<sub>el</sub>''F'' = -Δ<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>H</sub>+, the diffusion pressure of protons, Δ<sub>d</sub>Π<sub>H</sub>+ = ''RT''∙Δ<sub>c</sub><sub>H</sub>+ [Pa=J∙m<sup>-3</sup>] is balanced by electric pressure, maintained by counterions of H<sup>+</sup>. Diffusional and electric pressures are isomorphic, additive, and yield protonmotive pressure (pmp). (4) The dependence of proton leak on pmf varies with Δ<sub>el</sub>''F'' versus Δ<sub>d</sub>''F''<sub>H</sub>+, in agreement with experimental evidence. The flux-force relationship is concave at high mitochondrial volume fractions, but near-exponential at small mt-matrix volume ratios. Linear flux-pmp relationships imply a near-exponential dependence of the proton leak on the pmf.
|editor=[[Kandolf G]], [[Gnaiger E]]
|editor=[[Kandolf G]], [[Gnaiger E]]
}}
}}
Line 13: Line 13:
::::#Oroboros Instruments
::::#Oroboros Instruments
::::::Innsbruck, Austria. - [email protected]
::::::Innsbruck, Austria. - [email protected]
== Reference ==
::::#Mitchell P (1966) Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Glynn Research, Bodmin, Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergetics 1807:1507-38

Revision as of 07:27, 3 August 2018

The protonmotive force under pressure: an isomorphic analysis.

Link: EBEC2018

Gnaiger E (2018)

Event: EBEC2018 Budapest HU

‘.. the sum of the electrical pressure difference and the osmotic pressure difference (i.e. the electrochemical potential difference) of protons’ [1] links to non-ohmic flux-force relationships between proton leak and protonmotive force (pmf). This is experimentally established, has direct consequences on mitochondrial physiology, but is theoretically little understood. Here I distinguish pressure from potential differences (diffusion: ΔμH+ or ΔdFH+; electric: ΔΨ or ΔelF), to explain non-ohmic flux-force relationships on the basis of four thermodynamic theorems. (1) Einstein’s diffusion equation explains the concentration gradient (dc/dz) in Fick’s law as the product of chemical potential gradient (the vector force and resistance determine the velocity, v, of a particle) and local concentration, c. This yields the chemical pressure gradient (van’t Hoff equation): ddΠ/dz = RT∙dc/dz. Flux is the product of v and c; c varies with force. Therefore, flux-force relationships are non-linear. (2) The pmf is not a vector force; the gradient is replaced by a pressure difference, and local concentration by a distribution function or free activity, α. Flux is a function of α and force, Jd = bα∙ΔdFB = -b∙ΔdΠB. (3) At ΔelF = -ΔdFH+, the diffusion pressure of protons, ΔdΠH+ = RT∙ΔcH+ [Pa=J∙m-3] is balanced by electric pressure, maintained by counterions of H+. Diffusional and electric pressures are isomorphic, additive, and yield protonmotive pressure (pmp). (4) The dependence of proton leak on pmf varies with ΔelF versus ΔdFH+, in agreement with experimental evidence. The flux-force relationship is concave at high mitochondrial volume fractions, but near-exponential at small mt-matrix volume ratios. Linear flux-pmp relationships imply a near-exponential dependence of the proton leak on the pmf.


Bioblast editor: Kandolf G, Gnaiger E


Labels:







Affiliations

  1. D. Swarovski Research Lab, Dept Visceral, Transplant Thoracic Surgery, Medical Univ Innsbruck
  2. Oroboros Instruments
Innsbruck, Austria. - [email protected]

Reference

  1. Mitchell P (1966) Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Glynn Research, Bodmin, Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergetics 1807:1507-38