Talk:Bioblast 2022: Difference between revisions
From Bioblast
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::* Academic institutions propagate the publication business by imprisoning academic careers into the impact factor lock-up. Do we need a change? How can we change? — Never alone, only by raising awareness collectively. Join [[DORA]]. | ::::* Academic institutions propagate the publication business by imprisoning academic careers into the impact factor lock-up. Do we need a change? How can we change? — Never alone, only by raising awareness collectively. Join [[DORA]]. | ||
::::* ‘Open Access’ at a publication charge of $ 4620? Does the publication charge make a good journal? | ::::* ‘Open Access’ at a publication charge of $ 4620? Does the publication charge make a good journal? The paywall business model would collapse, when scientists refuse to do the journalism jobs in the financial interest of paywall journals. | ||
::::::* [[Gnaiger_2021_Bioenerg_Commun#Pergamon_Press_and_Elsevier |Elsevier and Pergamon Press]] | ::::::* [[Gnaiger_2021_Bioenerg_Commun#Pergamon_Press_and_Elsevier |Elsevier and Pergamon Press]] | ||
Revision as of 22:45, 16 June 2022
Discussion: The future of BEC
A discussion on publishing
Gnaiger Erich 2022-06-16
- The lockdown phase was a bad timing for starting BEC, since it separated us by preventing real life meetings from happening. Bioblast 2022 is a re-start: We will discuss the future of BEC.
- Academic institutions propagate the publication business by imprisoning academic careers into the impact factor lock-up. Do we need a change? How can we change? — Never alone, only by raising awareness collectively. Join DORA.
- ‘Open Access’ at a publication charge of $ 4620? Does the publication charge make a good journal? The paywall business model would collapse, when scientists refuse to do the journalism jobs in the financial interest of paywall journals.
